Client and contract
The relationship that gives the requirement its meaning.
Guidance by trigger
A questionnaire, an audit, market entry or the maintenance of several engagements each call for distinct decisions and levels of evidence.
Review situationsThe supplier examines its own capability. The European client defines the supplier decision it needs to reach.
Self-assess my organisation →Assess a supplier →Search the platform →Choose an engagement
Start from what needs to be obtained now: an answer, an in-depth review, or a capability tracked over time.
View all engagementsVerify and remediate.
EU exposureClient and technical assessmentEvidence and remediationAll preparations →Keep the current commitments.
Continuous assuranceClient assurance officeProduct security cellAll recurring services →Basis for the conclusions
The same trail links Promise, Policy, Practice, Platform, finding, remediation and controlled sharing.
Review the 4P methodSee fictitious examples to understand the structure and depth of the deliverables.
See examples of deliverables →Terms of engagement
Confidentiality, independence, reversibility and traceability of responsibilities structure the conduct of the work.
Review the firm's rulesHave an international supplier assessed under explicit mandate and sharing rules.
Assess a supplier →Method and evidence
The European assurance register organises knowledge by the commitment made to each European client, not solely by framework.
Question addressed
The question that decides a renewal is not "are we compliant with ISO 27001?" but "what can we support in front of Client A?". Tracking organised solely by framework cannot answer that. The assurance register, by contrast, organises knowledge by European client, then by commitment made to that client. Each commitment carries its 4P trail, its evidence, its owner, its exceptions and its next deadline.
In practice, the register becomes the single place where you know what was promised, to whom, on what basis, and what still supports it today. When a questionnaire arrives, you start from what already exists instead of starting from scratch; when a piece of evidence expires, the commitments concerned are flagged; when an audit is announced, the file already exists.
Memory per client engagement
The relationship that gives the requirement its meaning.
The exact response or clause to be maintained.
4P, evidence, exceptions and level of verification.
Remediation, residual risk and next deadline.
Decision enabledAt any moment, you know what has been promised to each European client — and what still proves it.
Reading a conclusion
The register does not simply juxtapose controls. It makes it possible to trace back from a clause or a client response to its current evidence, its exception, its owner and its next deadline, and then to see which relationships are affected by a change.
The summary view remains derived from the detailed commitments; it does not create a parallel status that cannot be reconciled.
Implementation
Each questionnaire response, accepted clause or written statement enters the register with its exact origin: document, version, question and date.
The commitment points to the policy, the observed practice, the platform reality and the evidence supporting it — along with their level of verification.
A partially supported commitment carries its documented exception and its assigned remediation. The status evolves with the facts, not with intentions.
Evidence expiries, audits, renewals and reviews feed a single calendar. Emergencies become rare because they become visible early.
Terms of use
They determine who can amend a commitment, accept an exception and confirm that a piece of evidence still supports the client relationship.
Your GRC tool organises controls by framework. The assurance register organises commitments by client: this is the view that's missing at renewal, during a client audit, or when negotiating an annex. The two can coexist without duplication.
During an engagement, iKNSA. In steady state, your teams with defined roles, or iKNSA on a recurring basis. Each entry remains attributed and dated.
Yes, fully: the register can be exported in open formats, documents included. Reversibility is part of the contract.
Continue reading
The demonstration view makes it possible to follow an engagement from the contract through to its current evidence and its next decision.