Your contextContext not defined
Country of the organisation assessedNot provided
What it providesNot provided
Relationship with the EUNot provided
Home / Trust & firm

Trust & firm

Independence

Remediation carried out by iKNSA is never presented as an independent certification.

Role governance

Independence is not something declared: it is determined from the principal, prior engagements and the intended use of the conclusion.

The level of assurance depends on the role actually held. The scoping stage separates advisory, implementation, verification and certification so that the conclusion never implies an independence that does not exist.

Firm's position

A remediation carried out by iKNSA is never presented as an independent certification of that same remediation.

Reading of the mandate

The role held and the intended use of the conclusion determine the required level of independence.

01

Advisory, implementation and verification roles made explicit

02

Potential conflicts declared before engagement

03

Information sharing agreed

04

Independent validation entrusted to a separate party

Putting into practice

Keep the role held alongside each conclusion.

Principal

Identify who is requesting, funding and using the work.

Previous roles

Identify any advisory work, implementation or review already carried out.

Potential conflicts

Declare any situations liable to affect objectivity.

Agreed measures

Separate roles, limit scope or use a third party where necessary.

Checkpoints

01

Mandate

The exact question entrusted to the firm.

02

Role

Advisory, implementation, review or client assistance.

03

Sharing

The agreed recipients and information-sharing rules.

04

Conclusion

The level of assurance actually supported.

Mandate trace

Keep the role held alongside each conclusion.

The report names the principal, the role held by iKNSA, the relevant prior work, the authorised recipients and the level of assurance that this role can genuinely support.

Review traceability →
MANDATRole governanceROLESPrior roles, potential conflictsCONCLUSIONThe scope of the conclusion remains consistent with the role actually held.

Preliminary exchange

Qualify the roles before choosing the form of review.

Present the principal, the intended use of the conclusion and the work already carried out, so that roles can be qualified before any proposal.

Ask a question