Home / Context
Context
Compare European contexts
Model multiple contracting entities, activities or relationships with structured data.
Guidance by trigger
The triggering event determines the order of the analysis.
A questionnaire, an audit, market entry or the maintenance of several engagements each call for distinct decisions and levels of evidence.
Review situationsThe role determines the mandate
The supplier examines its own capability. The European client defines the supplier decision it needs to reach.
Self-assess my organisation →Assess a supplier →Search the platform →Choose an engagement
Meet the deadline. Establish capacity. Sustain commitments.
Start from what needs to be obtained now: an answer, an in-depth review, or a capability tracked over time.
View all engagements02
Prepare
Verify and remediate.
EU exposureClient and technical assessmentEvidence and remediationAll preparations →03
Maintain
Keep the current commitments.
Continuous assuranceClient assurance officeProduct security cellAll recurring services →Basis for the conclusions
From the client's requirement to a qualified piece of evidence.
The same trail links Promise, Policy, Practice, Platform, finding, remediation and controlled sharing.
Review the 4P methodFrameworks and sectors
GDPR and international accessHealth data and HDSNIS2 and the supply chainIndustrial confidentialityAll frameworks →View deliverables
See fictitious examples to understand the structure and depth of the deliverables.
See examples of deliverables →Terms of engagement
Responsibilities, information and limits established before the engagement.
Confidentiality, independence, reversibility and traceability of responsibilities structure the conduct of the work.
Review the firm's rulesEuropean principals
Have an international supplier assessed under explicit mandate and sharing rules.
Assess a supplier →