iKNSA International
Self-assessment10 to 15 minClient areaContact iKNSA

Guidance by trigger

The triggering event determines the order of the analysis.

A questionnaire, an audit, market entry or the maintenance of several engagements each call for distinct decisions and levels of evidence.

Review situations

A client request exists

Security questionnaireContractual annexAnnounced auditFindings received

A decision needs to be prepared

RenewalEU call for tendersEU market entryProduct security

The role determines the mandate

The supplier examines its own capability. The European client defines the supplier decision it needs to reach.

Self-assess my organisation →Assess a supplier →Search the platform →

Choose an engagement

Meet the deadline. Establish capacity. Sustain commitments.

Start from what needs to be obtained now: an answer, an in-depth review, or a capability tracked over time.

View all engagements
01

Reply

A document and a deadline.

QuestionnaireAnnexAuditAll responses →
02

Prepare

Verify and remediate.

EU exposureClient and technical assessmentEvidence and remediationAll preparations →
03

Maintain

Keep the current commitments.

Continuous assuranceClient assurance officeProduct security cellAll recurring services →

Basis for the conclusions

From the client's requirement to a qualified piece of evidence.

The same trail links Promise, Policy, Practice, Platform, finding, remediation and controlled sharing.

Review the 4P method

Trace

Evidence traceabilityAssurance registerTrust roomContinuous verification

Frameworks and sectors

GDPR and international accessHealth data and HDSNIS2 and the supply chainIndustrial confidentialityCountry filesExport mapAll frameworks →

View deliverables

See fictitious examples to understand the structure and depth of the deliverables.

See examples of deliverables →

Terms of engagement

Responsibilities, information and limits established before the engagement.

Confidentiality, independence, reversibility and traceability of responsibilities structure the conduct of the work.

Review the firm's rules

Trust rules

ConfidentialityIndependenceSecurityReversibility

Working with iKNSA

ExpertiseInternational engagementsRequest an engagementContact

European principals

Have an international supplier assessed under explicit mandate and sharing rules.

Assess a supplier →
Your contextGeneral reading

Adapt the reading to the assessed company’s country and activity.

Home / Jurisdictions / Moldova

Country file

Moldova

The country's exports are dominated by agricultural and food products. Roughly half the population is connected and local hosting is dense there. Regional benchmarks: Europe and Central Asia.

Relationship with the European Union

Association Agreement with the European Union — in force since 2016

A trade agreement settles customs duties and the origin of goods. It does not settle security: the audit rights and evidence expected by the European client remain the same.

Sources reviewed on 17 September 2026

01

Economy and sectors

In force

Association Agreement with the European Union

in force since 2016A trade agreement settles customs duties and the origin of goods. It does not settle security: the audit rights and evidence expected by the European client remain the same.

Map of trade agreements — European Commission
Third country

regime applicable to European data and access

European framework trackedNo general adequacy decision. The transfer mechanism and its accompanying measures must be chosen according to the actual data flows.

Adequacy decisions — European Commission
Designated persons

European Union restrictive measures targeting the country

EU Sanctions Map, as at 26 September 2026The EU targets designated individuals and entities here, not trade with the country. Screen the supplier, its directors and its shareholders against the consolidated list of designated persons and entities.

Council Regulation (EU) 2023/888
02

Incidents, fraud and impersonation

13 318

secure servers per million inhabitants

2024, latest available figureLocal hosting and certifications are common there. That says nothing about the security of any given provider — only about the terrain in which it operates.

Secure Internet servers — World Bank
Disputed batch

traceability that holds up in a dispute

Cross-cutting controlA dispute over a batch is settled on the evidence: shipping documents, certificates and correspondence must be producible without relying on a single person.

03

Points to check within your organisation

To be traced

The chain through to the manufacturer

The evidence here rests on batch traceability, processing sites and the cold chain. Ask how far back traceability goes and who documents it.

To be governed

The data that travels with the batches

Without an adequacy decision, even traceability data falls under a transfer tool as soon as it identifies individuals. Ask what is actually being transmitted, and under what safeguards.

To be located

Where your data actually resides

Local hosting is common here, which does not tell you where your data actually lands: ask for the country of each environment, including backups, and who holds the keys.

Developments to be aware of

The topics that may change your answers

EU restrictive measures

The EU targets designated individuals and entities here, not trade with the country. Screen the supplier, its directors and its shareholders against the consolidated list of designated persons and entities.

EU Sanctions Map — European Commission
What this means for your situation

Food products: 56.1% of goods exported. Evidence here rests first on traceability and sites, ahead of technical infrastructure.

Official sources

Confidential exchange

Describe your European relationship and the request received.

The Moldova file establishes a country and its relationship with the Union. What remains is to establish how far back traceability of your batches goes, and who documents it.

Contact iKNSA