Your contextContext not defined
Country of the organisation assessedNot provided
What it providesNot provided
Relationship with the EUNot provided
Home / Trust & firm

Trust & firm

Partners

Legal, certification and specialist testing roles remain named and kept separate.

Bring in a skill set without diluting accountability

A partner steps in for a defined piece of work when the engagement calls for specialist expertise or local capacity that the mandate must make visible.

A specialist or local operator joins an engagement only for an identified contribution, with limited access, assigned responsibility and an explicit handover rule.

Named contribution

The client knows who performs the work, who reviews it, and how that contribution feeds into the final conclusion.

Distributed responsibilities

Each specialist contribution remains attributed, controlled and visible within the mandate.

01

Genuine relationships only

02

Responsibility visible in the engagement plan

03

Cascaded confidentiality

04

Independence preserved

Putting into practice

Attribute each contribution in the report.

Requirement

Define the missing competency and the precise question it must address.

Selection

Review relevant experience, conflicts, security and availability for the engagement.

Access

Limit information, systems and people to the strict need of the contribution.

Integration

Review the work produced and attribute its use in the handover delivered to the client.

Checkpoints

01

Mandate

Exact work assigned to the contributor.

02

Competence

Specialised or local capacity sought.

03

Control

Review applied before the result is merged.

04

Transparency

Role communicated to the client and visible in the deliverable.

Mandate trace

Attribute each contribution in the report.

Each specialist contribution remains linked to a specific piece of work, an owner, only the strictly necessary information, and the person who validates its inclusion in the final conclusion.

Review traceability →
MANDATBring in a skill set without diluting accountabilityROLESSelection, AccessCONCLUSIONThe presence of a partner does not leave the author of the work or the party responsible for the conclusion implicit.

Preliminary exchange

Discuss a genuinely necessary specialist contribution.

Describe the specialist skill expected, the proposed role and the information the contributor should be able to access.

Ask a question