Home / Prepare
Prepare
In-depth client and technical assessment
A configurable engagement linking client expectations, governance, application, platform, identity and operations.
In your situation
What the scoping will need to take into account.
Ability to establish
Assess the client relationship and the technical reality within the same scope.
The review works down from the commitments made to clients to the policies, practices, configurations and records that actually make it possible to support them.
Point of convergencePreparation reportGovernance, technical and evidence
Subject of the work
The scope links clients, organisation and systems.
Preparation report
Define the priority client relationshipsReview policies, practices and systemsSample the evidenceRank gaps by commercial impact
How it actually unfolds
Organise the review before mobilising the teams.
Multi-stakeholder assessment combining documentary review, interviews and technical sampling across the agreed scope.
A sponsor guarantees access to the managers and to the supporting evidence; each area retains an owner for its response.
Priority client relationships, organisation, policies, architecture, inventories, incidents, evidence and prior assessments.
The timeline depends on the areas included, the number of entities and the level of corroboration expected; findings are shared in stages.
Review
Link client requirements, organisation and systems within a single review.
Define the priority client relationships
The most significant relationships determine the scope, the decisions expected, and the depth of sampling that is worthwhile.
Review policies, practices and systems
The declared policy is checked against the teams' actual practices and the mechanisms genuinely enforced or logged by the systems.
Sample the evidence
Samples are selected to answer a specific question, and their scope remains visible in the conclusion.
Rank gaps by commercial impact
Gaps are ranked by the client promise affected, the technical exposure and the effort required to address them.
Handover
The deliverable shared with senior management and technical leads alike.
Preparation report
The report sets out the conclusions by client commitment, their level of corroboration and the decisions still open.
4P map
The map exposes the discrepancies between the promise, the policy, the teams' practice and the platform's mechanisms.
Evidence register
Reviewed evidence is indexed by question, population, period, source and sharing restriction.
Remediation roadmap
The roadmap sequences corrections according to the commitment affected, the dependencies and the expected exit evidence.
Scoping the engagement
Choose the commitments and systems to examine together.
Priority client relationships and the systems that support them determine who to meet, the samples and the depth of corroboration.